Improving the Performance of Loan Risk Prediction based on Machine Learning via Applying Deep Neural Networks



Abstract Views
313

Downloads
214

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Oct 23, 2022
Published Jan 23, 2023
10.24018/ejece.2023.7.1.475

Abstract viewed = 313 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Deep learning algorithms can be applied to data acquired regularly from consumers' financial activity in order to create predictive tools used to foresee credit card defaults. Methods such as Convolutional Neural Networks and Recurrent Neural networks were utilized to improve the performance of loan risk prediction, hence lowering the risk to financial institutions. To compare the two models, the same data set was used. With the goal of better modeling and moving their precise measures for gauging model performance, the same initial dataset was used. Predictions from deep learning algorithms are helpful in many different areas of study, including representation and abstraction that make sense of images, sound, and text. The study laid the groundwork for filling the void left by outdated banking tools and inadequate computer technology by applying deep learning algorithms to the problem of credit card default prediction.
Keywords: Credit Card Default, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Somasundaram A, Reddy S. Parallel and incremental credit card fraud detection model to handle concept drift and data imbalance. Neural Computing and Applications, 2018; 31(S1): 3?14. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00521-018-3633-8.
     Google Scholar
  2. Barua B, Barua S. COVID-19 implications for banks: evidence from an emerging economy. SN Business & Economics, 2020; 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-020-00013-w.
     Google Scholar
  3. Couronn? R, Probst P, Boulesteix AL. Random forest versus logistic regression: a large-scale benchmark experiment. BMC Bioinformatics, 2018; 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2264-5.
     Google Scholar
  4. Said I, Qu Y. A Study on the Performance Comparison of Five Popular Machine Learning Models Applied for Loan Risk Prediction, to appear in Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence, Dec. 14-16, 2022: Las Vegas, USA.
     Google Scholar
  5. Han L, Yu C, Xiao K, Zhao X. A new method of mixed gas identification based on a convolutional neural network for time series classification. Sensors, 2019; 19(9): 1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19091960.
     Google Scholar
  6. Priyadharshini JMH, Kavitha S, Bharathi B. Classification and analysis of human activities. 2017 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP), 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccsp.2017.8286571.
     Google Scholar
  7. Debayle J, Hatami N, Gavet Y. Classification of time-series images using deep convolutional neural networks. 10th International Conference on Machine Vision (ICMV 2017), 2018. https://doi.org/10.1117/ 12.2309486.
     Google Scholar
  8. Saez Y, Baldominos A, Isasi P. A comparison study of classifier algorithms for cross-person physical activity recognition. Sensors, 2016;17(12):66. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17010066.
     Google Scholar
  9. Ashour MAH, Abbas RA. Improving time series? forecast errors by using recurrent neural networks. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3185089.3185151.
     Google Scholar
  10. Zhang C, Lim P, Qin AK, Tan KC. Multiobjective deep belief networks ensemble for remaining useful life estimation in prognostics. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2017; 28(10): 2306?2318. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnnls.2016.2582798.
     Google Scholar
  11. Wang S, Hua G, Hao G, Xie C. A cycle deep belief network model for multivariate time series classification. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017, 1?7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9549323.
     Google Scholar
  12. Barua B, Barua S. COVID-19 implications for banks: evidence from an emerging economy. SN Business & Economics, 2020;1(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-020-00013-w.
     Google Scholar
  13. Macklin T, Mathews J. Big data, little security: Addressing security issues in your platform. Next-Generation Analyst V, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2268002.
     Google Scholar
  14. Tene O, Polonetsky J. Big data for all: privacy and user control in the age of analytics. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 2013; 11(5): 239.
     Google Scholar
  15. Gupta H, Varshney H, Sharma TK, Pachauri N, Verma OP. Comparative performance analysis of quantum machine learning with deep learning for diabetes prediction. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00398-7.
     Google Scholar
  16. Goutte C, Gaussier E. A Probabilistic Interpretation of Precision, Recall and F-Score, with Implication for Evaluation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005: 345?359. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31865-1_25.
     Google Scholar
  17. UCI Machine Learning Repository. Irvine, CA: the University of California, School of Information and Computer Science. Retrieved from: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/default+of+credit+card+clients.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)