##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

In perspective of their environmental friendliness and energy efficiency, Electric Vehicles (EVs) are posing a threat to traditional gasoline automobiles. Identifying the future charging needs of EV users may be aided by the forecasting of states linked to EV charging. It might deliver customized charge capacity statistics based on users' real-time locations as well as direct the operation and management of charging infrastructure. Consequently, an emergent problem is the effective model of EV charging state predictions. In this study, a hybrid deep learning approach is suggested to assure safe and dependable charging operations that prevent the battery from being overcharged or discharged. A Recursive Neural Networks (RNNs) for feature extraction process is suggested to acquire adequate feature information on the battery. The bidirectional gated recurrent unit framework (GRU) was then established by the study to predict the state of the EV. The GRU receives its input from the RNNs' output, which substantially enhances the effectiveness of the model. Because of its much simpler structure, the RNN-GRU has a lower computational performance. The experimental findings demonstrate the GRU method's ability to accurately track mileage of the electric vehicle. A hybrid deep learning-based prediction approach could give quick convergence speed less error rate in comparison to the appropriate method for obtaining state of charge estimate over conventional models, as demonstrated by the extensive real-world tests.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Wang K, Wang W, Wang L, Li L. An Improved SOC Control Strategy for Electric Vehicle Hybrid Energy Storage Systems. Energies, 2020;13(20):5297. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13205297.
     Google Scholar
  2. Yuan, Deling, Sun M, Zhao M, Tang S, Qi J, Zhang X, Wang K, Li B. Persulfate promoted ZnIn2S4 visible light photocatalytic dye decomposition. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 2020; 15(2020): 8761-8770.
     Google Scholar
  3. Zhang Q, Li G. A predictive energy management system for hybrid energy storage systems in electric vehicles. Electrical Engineering, 2019;101(3):759?770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-019-00822-9.
     Google Scholar
  4. Ren G, Wang J, Chen C, Wang H. A variable-voltage ultra-capacitor/battery hybrid power source for extended range electric vehicle. Energy, 2021; 231: 120837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120837.
     Google Scholar
  5. Kai W, Shengzhe Z, Yanting Z, Jun R, Liwei L, Yong L. Synthesis of porous carbon by activation method and its electrochemical performance. Int J Electrochem Sci, 2018;13(11):10766?10773, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  6. Wen J, Zhao D, Zhang C. An overview of electricity powered vehicles: Lithium-ion battery energy storage density and energy conversion efficiency. Renew. Energy, 2020;162:1629?1648.
     Google Scholar
  7. Geng C, Jin X, Zhang X. Simulation research on a novel control strategy for fuel cell extended-range vehicles. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2019;44(1): 408?420.
     Google Scholar
  8. Chu Y, Wu Y, Chen J, Zheng S, Wang Z. Design of energy and materials for ammonia-based extended-range electric vehicles. Energy Procedia, 2019;158:3064?3069.
     Google Scholar
  9. Li G, Xia J, Wang K, Deng Y, He X, Wang Y. A single-stage interleaved resonant bridgeless boost rectifier with high-frequency isolation. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron., 2019;8(2):1767?1781.
     Google Scholar
  10. Kouchachvili L, Ya?ci W, Entchev E Hybrid battery/supercapacitor energy storage system for the electric vehicles. J. Power Sources, 2018;374:237?248.
     Google Scholar
  11. She C, Wang Z, Sun F, Liu P, Zhang L. Battery aging assessment for real-world electric buses based on incremental capacity analysis and radial basis function neural network. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., 2019;16(5):3345?3354.
     Google Scholar
  12. Huang L, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Zhang L, Zhu X, Dorrell DD. Thermal runaway behavior during overcharge for large-format Lithium-ion batteries with different packaging patterns. Journal of Energy Storage, 2019;25:100811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.100811.
     Google Scholar
  13. Chen N, Zhang P, Dai J, Gui W. Estimating the state-of-charge of lithium-ion battery using an H-infinity observer based on electrochemical impedance model. Ieee Access, 2020;8:26872?26884.
     Google Scholar
  14. Sun W, Qiu Y, Sun L, Huan Q. Neural network-based learning and estimation of battery state-of-charge: a comparison study between direct and indirect methodology. Int. J. Energy Res., 2020;44(13):10307?10319.
     Google Scholar
  15. Luo L, Gu W, Wu Z, Zhou S. Joint planning of distributed generation and electric vehicle charging stations considering real-time charging navigation. Appl. Energy, 2019;242:1274?1284.
     Google Scholar
  16. Zhang C, Greenblatt JB, MacDougall P, Saxena S, Prabhakar AJ. Quantifying the benefits of electric vehicles on the future electricity grid in the midwestern United States. Appl. Energy, 2020;270:115174.
     Google Scholar
  17. Bai Y, Li J, He H, Santos RCD, Yang Q. Optimal Design of a Hybrid Energy Storage System in a Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle for Battery Lifetime Improvement. IEEE Access, 2020;8:142148?142158. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3013596.
     Google Scholar
  18. Jampeethong P, Khomfoi S. Coordinated Control of Electric Vehicles and Renewable Energy Sources for Frequency Regulation in Microgrids. IEEE Access, 2020;8:141967?141976. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3010276.
     Google Scholar
  19. Haupt L, Sch?pf M, Wederhake L, Weibelzahl M. The influence of electric vehicle charging strategies on the sizing of electrical energy storage systems in charging hub microgrids. Appl. Energy, 2020;273:115231.
     Google Scholar