Identify the Dynamic Position of Moving Vessels using Big Data and Deep Learning Approaches

Identify the Dynamic Position of Moving Vessels using Big Data and Deep Learning Approaches



HTML
173

Total
17

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Recently, various purposes such as computer vision, self-driving vehicles, self-directed shipping, and so on. Therefore, machine learning and deep learning algorithms have demonstrated strong routine. Using machine learning applications, we can implement sophisticated functionality without relying on complex code constructions. An alternative is to train a learning system on a collected training dataset and ensure that it performs as expected. Two main benefits of a deep-learning-based system over a hard-coded one exist. A Reinforcement Learning, and deep learning-based system does not require such complex hard-coded algorithms, which makes it less prone to error and easier to implement. In this study we proposed a deep learning-driven systems are able to adapt to different situations by retraining their algorithms on collected data. Proposed method influenced varying obtain leaning to another example of changing conditions. Systems can adapt even when input distributions change over time.

Keywords: Deep Learning Dynamic Positioning System Q-Learning Reinforcement Learning
  1. Montero D, Aginako N, Sierra B, Nieto M. Efficient large-scale face clustering using an online Mixture of Gaussians. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2022 Sep 1;114:105079.
     Google Scholar 
  2. Du W, Ding S, Guo L, Zhang J, Zhang C, Ding L. Value function factorization with dynamic weighting for deep multi-agent reinforcement learning. Inf Sci (N Y), 2022 Nov 1;615:191–208.
     Google Scholar 
  3. Yang S, Wang J, Xu Z. Real-time scheduling for distributed permutation flowshops with dynamic job arrivals using deep reinforcement learning. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2022 Oct 1;54:101776.
     Google Scholar 
  4. Hildebrandt FD, Thomas BW, Ulmer MW. Opportunities for reinforcement learning in stochastic dynamic vehicle routing. Comput Oper Res., 2023; 150: 106071. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S030505482200301X
     Google Scholar 
  5. Ait-Saadi A, Meraihi Y, Soukane A, Ramdane-Cherif A, Benmessaoud Gabis A. A novel hybrid Chaotic Aquila Optimization algorithm with Simulated Annealing for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles path planning. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 2022; 104: 108461. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0045790622006760.
     Google Scholar 
  6. Zhang Y. Chaotic neural network algorithm with competitive learning for global optimization. Knowl Based Syst., 2021 Nov 14;231:107405.
     Google Scholar 
  7. Bo L, Han L, Xiang C, Liu H, Ma T. A Q-learning fuzzy inference system based online energy management strategy for off-road hybrid electric vehicles. Energy, 2022 Aug 1;252:123976.
     Google Scholar 
  8. Trans JLS. Optimal thrust allocation in a dynamic positioning system. 2008 [Internet]. [cited 2023 Feb 27]; Available from: https://dynamic-positioning.com/proceedings/dp2008/abstract_thrusters_leavitt.pdf.
     Google Scholar 
  9. Skulstad R, Li G, Zhang H, Fossen TI. A Neural Network Approach to Control Allocation of Ships for Dynamic Positioning. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2018 Jan 1;51(29):128–33.
     Google Scholar 
  10. Ma Y, Noreña-Caro DA, Adams AJ, Brentzel TB, Romagnoli JA, Benton MG. Machine-learning-based simulation and fed-batch control of cyanobacterial-phycocyanin production in Plectonema by artificial neural network and deep reinforcement learning. Comput Chem Eng., 2020 Nov 2;142:107016.
     Google Scholar 
  11. Xuebin L, Luchun Y. Nonlinear fault-accommodation thrust allocation for over-activated vessels using artificial neural network and multivariate analysis. Ocean Engineering. 2022 Dec 15;266:112936.
     Google Scholar 
  12. Grewal MS, Andrews AP. Applications of Kalman Filtering in Aerospace 1960 to the Present. IEEE Control Syst. 2010;30(3):69–78.
     Google Scholar 
  13. Balchen J, Jenssen N, Mathisen E, Sælid S. A dynamic positioning system based on Kalman filtering and optimal control. 1980 [cited 2023 Feb 27]; Available from: https://www.mic-journal.no/ABS/MIC-1980-3-1.asp/.
     Google Scholar 
  14. Škach J, Pun?ochá? I. Input Design for Fault Detection Using Extended Kalman Filter and Reinforcement Learning. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2017 Jul 1;50(1):7302–7.
     Google Scholar 
  15. Kokotovich V, Purcell T. Mental synthesis and creativity in design: an experimental examination. Des Stud. 2000 Sep 1;21(5):437–49.
     Google Scholar 
  16. Wang S, Yang X, Wang Z, Guo L. Summary of Research on Related Technologies of Ship Dynamic Positioning System. E3S Web of Conferences [Internet]. 2021 Jan 27 [cited 2023 Feb 27];233:04032. Available from: https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/abs/2021/09/e3sconf_iaecst20_04032/e3sconf_iaecst20_04032.html
     Google Scholar 
  17. Skjetne R, Fossen TI, Kokotovi? P v. Robust output maneuvering for a class of nonlinear systems. Automatica. 2004 Mar 1;40(3):373–83.
     Google Scholar 
  18. Katebi MR, Moradi MH. Predictive PID controllers. IEE Proceedings: Control Theory and Applications. 2001 Nov;148(6):478–87.
     Google Scholar 
  19. Barto A, Thomas PS, Sutton RS. Some Recent Applications of Reinforcement Learning. [Internet] 2017 [cited 2023 Feb 27]; Available from: https://people.cs.umass.edu/~pthomas/papers/Barto2017.pdf.
     Google Scholar 
  20. Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D, Graves A, Antonoglou I, Wierstra D, et al. Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning. 2013 Dec 19 [cited 2023 Feb 27]; Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5602v1.
     Google Scholar 
  21. Silver D, Hubert T, Schrittwieser J, Antonoglou I, Lai M, Guez A, Lanctot M, et al. A general reinforcement learning algorithm that masters chess, shogi, and Go through self-play. Science, 2018; 362(6419): 1140–1144. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar6404.
     Google Scholar 
  22. Sulima A, Veremey V. A highly efficient slot antenna. 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and CNC-USNC/URSI Radio Science Meeting - Leading the Wave, AP-S/URSI 2010.
     Google Scholar 
  23. Veremey EI. H?-Approach to Wave Disturbance Filtering for Marine Autopilots. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 2012 Jan 1;45(27):410–5.
     Google Scholar 
  24. Le AV, Kyaw PT, Veerajagadheswar P, Muthugala MAVJ, Elara MR, Kumar M, et al. Reinforcement learning-based optimal complete water-blasting for autonomous ship hull corrosion cleaning system. Ocean Engineering. 2021 Jan 15;220:108477.
     Google Scholar 
  25. Greco C, Pace P, Basagni S, Fortino G. Jamming detection at the edge of drone networks using Multi-layer Perceptrons and Decision Trees. Appl Soft Comput. 2021 Nov 1;111:107806.
     Google Scholar 
  26. Cuong-Le T, Minh H le, Sang-To T, Khatir S, Mirjalili S, Abdel Wahab M. A novel version of grey wolf optimizer based on a balance function and its application for hyperparameters optimization in deep neural network (DNN) for structural damage identification. Eng Fail Anal. 2022 Dec 1;142:106829.
     Google Scholar 
  27. Manisha, Dhull SK, Singh KK. ECG Beat Classifiers: A Journey from ANN To DNN. Procedia Computer Science, 2020; 167, 747–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.340.
     Google Scholar 
  28. Mao Y, Wang T, Duan M. A DNN-based approach to predict dynamic mooring tensions for semi-submersible platform under a mooring line failure condition. Ocean Engineering. 2022 Dec 15;266:112767.
     Google Scholar 
  29. Qiang L, Bi-Guang H. Artificial Neural Network Controller for Automatic Ship Berthing Using Separate Route. Journal of Web Engineering, 2020; 19(7–8): 1089–1116–1089–1116. Available from: https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/JWE/article/view/5127/4419.
     Google Scholar 
  30. Ahmed YA, Hasegawa K. Automatic ship berthing using artificial neural network trained by consistent teaching data using nonlinear programming method. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2013 Nov 1; 26(10): 2287-304.
     Google Scholar 
  31. The effect of LNG-sloshing on the global responses. Google Scholar [Internet]. [cited 2023 Feb 27]. Available from: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C33&q=The+effect+of+LNG-sloshing+on+the+global+responses+of+LNG-carriers&btnG=.
     Google Scholar 
  32. Fossen TI, Perez T. Kalman filtering for positioning and heading control of ships and offshore rigs. IEEE control systems magazine. 2009;29(6):32–46.
     Google Scholar 
  33. Song SS, Kim SH, Kim HS, Jeon MR. A study on the feedforward control algorithm for dynamic positioning system using ship motion prediction. Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety. 2016;22(1):129–37.
     Google Scholar 
  34. Orcina. Vessel Theory: Wave Drift and Sum Frequency Loads. [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Sep 6]. Available from: https://www.orcina.com/webhelp/OrcaFlex/Content/html/Vesseltheory,Wavedriftandsumfrequencyl oads.htm.
     Google Scholar 
  35. Global Fishing Watch. Transparency for a Sustainable Ocean. [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://globalfishingwatch.org/.
     Google Scholar 

How to Cite

[1]
Mistry, S., Suaibia, T. and Bin, T.R.A. 2023. Identify the Dynamic Position of Moving Vessels using Big Data and Deep Learning Approaches. European Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. 7, 2 (Mar. 2023), 1–6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24018/ejece.2023.7.2.497.

Search Panel

Sunit Mistry
Google Scholar
Pubmed
Ejmed Journal

Tasnim Suaibia
Google Scholar
Pubmed
Ejmed Journal

Tareq Rageb Ahsan Bin
Google Scholar
Pubmed
Ejmed Journal