##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This article discusses the development of a Power System Stabilizer (PSS) utilizing the Virus Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm (VEPSO) to enhance power system stability. PSS is commonly used in the industry to suppress power system oscillations. The proposed algorithm was implemented on a Single Machine Infinite Bus (SMIB) system, and the PSS controller coefficients were optimized using VEPSO. The system was simulated under a specific disturbance in the generator input power, and the generator's dynamic responses were presented. The VEPSO algorithm's results, such as faster convergence, were compared to the ICA algorithm. The simulation results demonstrate that the recommended PSS significantly improves the power system's oscillation damping performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Qaderi-Baban P, Menhaj MB, Dosaranian-Moghadam M, Fakharian A. A coordinated performance of power system operated with participants in demand response programs considering environmental pollution constraints. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, 2020; 16: 15-29.
     Google Scholar
  2. Yokus H, Ozturk A. A robust crow search algorithm-based power system stabilizer for the SMIB system. Neural Computing and Applications, 2022; 34(11): 9161-9173.
     Google Scholar
  3. Qaderi-Baban P, Menhaj MB, Dosaranian-Moghadam M, Fakharian A. Intelligent multi-agent system for DC microgrid energy coordination control. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences,2019: 741-748.
     Google Scholar
  4. Selim, F., and Abdel-Fattah Attia. "Power System Stabilizer with Self-Tuning Based on Hierarchical Fuzzy Logic Controller." In 2022 23rd International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON), pp. 1-6. IEEE, 2022.
     Google Scholar
  5. Aleikish K, ?yvang T. LSTM-based PSS Design for Modern Power Systems. Scandinavian Simulation Society, 2022: 161-168.
     Google Scholar
  6. Eddine, Djamel G, Abdelkader S, Abdellatif N. Educational Support Using Graphical User Interfaces to a Robust Stabilizer H2-PSS Besed Genetic Algorithms study. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 2022; 19: 89-98.
     Google Scholar
  7. Dehghani M, Rezaei M, Shayanfard B, Vafamand N, Javadi M, Catal?o JP. PMU-based power system stabilizer design: Optimal signal selection and controller design. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2021; 57(6): 5677-5686.
     Google Scholar
  8. Yokus H, Ozturk A. A robust crow search algorithm-based power system stabilizer for the SMIB system. Neural Computing and Applications, 2022; 34(11): 9161-9173.
     Google Scholar
  9. Ansari, Javad, Abbasi AR, Heydari MH, Avazzadeh Z. Simultaneous design of fuzzy PSS and fuzzy STATCOM controllers for power system stability enhancement. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2022; 61(4): 2841-2850.
     Google Scholar
  10. Baban PQ, Rahimabadi IN. Input-output pairing criterion applied in the genetic algorithm for unstable linear systems. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Technical Sciences, 2016; 64(4): 873-876.
     Google Scholar
  11. Aribowo, Widi, Muslim S, Suprianto B, Haryudo S, Hermawan AC. Intelligent control of power system stabilizer based on Archimedes optimization algorithm?feed forward neural network. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 2021; 14(3): 43-53.
     Google Scholar
  12. Setiadi, Herlambang, Swandaru A, Asfani DA, Nasution TH, Abdullah M, Krismanto AU. Coordinated Design of DIPSS and CES Using MDEA for Stability Enhancement: Jawa-Bali Indonesian Power Grid Study Case. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 2022; 15(1): 251-261.
     Google Scholar
  13. Rashwan, Asmaa & Ahmed, Mahrous & Mossa, Mohamed & Baha-El-Din, Ayman & Alkhalaf, Salem & Senjyu, Tomonobu & Hemeida, Ashraf. (2021). Explicit adaptive power system stabilizer design based an on-line identifier for single-machine infinite bus. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 13. 10.1016/j.asej.2021.06.029.
     Google Scholar
  14. Kubotan N, Koji S. Role of Virus Infection in Virus-evolutionary Genetic Algorithm. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, 1996: 182?187.
     Google Scholar
  15. Lakshmanna, Kuruva, Khare N, Khare N. Constraint-based measures for DNA sequence mining using group search optimization algorithm. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 2016; 9(3): 91-100.
     Google Scholar
  16. Kubotan N, Fukuda T. Trajectory Planning of Cellar Manipulator System Using Virus- Evolutionary Genetic Algorithm. Robotics and Autonomous System, 1996: 85?94.
     Google Scholar
  17. Inoue, Takuya, Uwate, Yoko, Nishio, and Yoshifumi. Genetic Algorithm with virus infection for finding approximate solution. Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), 2013 IEEE International Symposium, 2013: 1604-1607.
     Google Scholar
  18. JiaQing Q, HongTao Y, Ping F. Research on optimization mechanism of virus evolutionary genetic algorithm. ICT Convergence (ICTC), 2012 International Conference, 2012: 612-614.
     Google Scholar