Impact of Ad Blockers on Computer Power Consumption while Web Browsing: A Comparative Analysis
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
This study explores the impact of various ad blockers on power consumption during web browsing, focusing on different types of online content. By analyzing power use across ten popular websites, the study assesses the performance of five widely utilized ad blockers: AdBlock, AdBlock Plus, uBlock, uBlock Origin, and uBlock Origin Lite. Power consumption was measured under controlled conditions, comparing scenarios with and without ad blockers to gain insight into their efficiency. The findings indicate substantial differences in power savings, with some ad blockers significantly reducing power usage, particularly on media-heavy sites, while others unexpectedly increased consumption under certain conditions. The study underscores the potential of ad blockers to enhance power efficiency in digital environments, highlighting the importance of optimizing ad-blocking techniques to reduce the environmental impact of online activities. Through comprehensive analysis and comparison, this research offers insights into selecting effective ad blockers to minimize power consumption, promoting more sustainable web browsing practices.
Downloads
Introduction
The rapid advancement of digital technologies has fundamentally transformed how we access, consume, and interact with information. The internet, once a supplementary resource, has evolved into the primary medium for content delivery, revolutionizing communication, entertainment, and commerce. With this shift, however, comes a set of challenges, particularly concerning the growing power demands associated with online activities. One of the most significant contributors to this increased power consumption is the proliferation of online advertisements.
Online advertisements have become an omnipresent feature across nearly every webpage. While they serve as a vital revenue stream for content creators and businesses, their impact on power consumption is substantial. These ads, especially those embedded with rich media content—such as videos, animations, and interactive elements—require considerable data transmission and processing power. As a result, they not only slow down page load times but also significantly increase the amount of power required to render web pages, leading to higher power usage.
This increase in power consumption has far-reaching implications, particularly within the context of environmental sustainability. The power required to load, transmit, and display advertisements directly contributes to the carbon footprint of internet usage, making it a critical issue in the ongoing efforts to combat climate change. With global internet usage continuing to rise, the cumulative power consumption from online activities, including the loading of advertisements, has become a significant environmental concern.
In response to these challenges, ad blockers have emerged as a popular solution. These tools are designed to prevent advertisements from loading, thereby reducing the clutter on web pages and improving user experience by speeding up load times. More importantly, ad blockers have the potential to reduce the power consumption associated with web browsing by preventing resource-intensive ads from loading. This potential power-saving benefit positions ad blockers as a key tool in the effort to make digital activities more sustainable.
This paper seeks to explore the relationship between online advertisements and power consumption and to evaluate the effectiveness of various ad blockers in mitigating this consumption. By comparing the power usage of websites with and without ads, as well as assessing the performance of different ad blockers across various types of content, this study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how digital advertising impacts power use. Furthermore, the study will investigate how ad-blocking technologies can contribute to reducing the environmental impact of online activities.
The investigation is grounded within the broader context of power efficiency in digital technologies, with a specific focus on the environmental impact of internet usage. The findings of this study are intended to contribute to the ongoing discourse on sustainable web design, the trade-offs associated with ad-blocking technologies, and the future of digital advertising in a world increasingly concerned with power conservation and climate change. By providing insights into the effectiveness of different ad blockers, this research aims to guide users in selecting tools that not only enhance their browsing experience but also contribute to a more sustainable digital environment.
Literature Review
The digitalization of various sectors, including marketing and content delivery, has significantly impacted energy consumption patterns. Ren et al. explored how the development of the Internet has influenced China’s power consumption. Their study revealed that increased digitalization leads to higher power demand, driven largely by the rapid expansion of internet services and data centers. This work underscores the importance of considering power consumption in the context of a rapidly digitalizing world, particularly as internet penetration continues to grow globally [1].
Building on the relationship between digital activities and power use, Thangam and Chavadi examined the specific impact of digital marketing practices on power consumption, climate change, and sustainability. Their research found that the growing reliance on digital marketing, including the use of big data and targeted advertising, contributes to higher power consumption. This is particularly evident in the increased power demands of running complex algorithms and data processing tasks associated with digital marketing strategies [2].
The evolution of content delivery networks (CDNs) has also been a critical factor in shaping power consumption in the digital economy. George and George discussed how CDNs have enhanced the efficiency of video streaming, gaming, and online advertising by reducing latency and improving the user experience. However, these improvements come at a cost, as the infrastructure required to support these services, including servers and data storage, contributes significantly to power use [3].
The monetization of digital content has added another layer of complexity to the power consumption narrative. Ulin explored the business models surrounding media distribution, including film, TV, and video content, in an online world. The shift from traditional distribution methods to digital platforms has required significant infrastructure investments, which in turn have led to increased power consumption. The need to deliver high-quality content to a global audience has pushed companies to invest in more powerful servers and enhanced data centers, further driving up power demands [4].
Similarly, Ji et al. analyzed the challenges of monetizing mobile platforms through in-app advertising while balancing user growth. Their study highlighted that the strategies used to optimize in-app advertisements, including targeted ads and interactive content, often require substantial computational power, leading to higher power consumption. As mobile platforms continue to grow, so too does the power footprint associated with delivering these services [5].
Albasir conducted an evaluation focused on the resources consumed by web advertisements on smartphones. The study, which examined various ad formats, found that video and interactive ads were particularly resource-intensive, leading to significant battery drain and increased data usage on mobile devices. These findings highlight the hidden costs of mobile advertising, not only in terms of power consumption but also in user experience, as the added strain on smartphone resources can degrade performance [6].
The environmental implications of online advertising were explored by Pärssinen et al. in their environmental impact assessment of online ads. The study provided a comprehensive analysis of the carbon footprint associated with different types of digital advertisements, revealing that ads with high multimedia content, such as video ads, contribute disproportionately to the overall environmental impact. This research underscores the need for more sustainable advertising practices that minimize environmental harm while maintaining effectiveness [7].
Castell-Uroz et al. took a closer look at content blockers, tools designed to prevent ads from loading, and their impact on performance and quality of experience. Their study found that while content blockers can improve page load times and reduce data usage, they also vary significantly in their effectiveness. Some blockers were found to inadvertently affect the quality of user experience by blocking not just ads but also essential content, highlighting the need for more nuanced and user-friendly ad-blocking solutions [8].
Frik, Haviland, and Acquisti explored the behavioral implications of ad blockers through a lab experiment that examined their impact on product search and purchase behavior. Their findings suggest that ad blockers, while improving the browsing experience by eliminating intrusive ads, also influence consumer behavior by altering the way users engage with online content, potentially affecting the effectiveness of digital marketing strategies [9].
Finally, Cozza et al. investigated the effectiveness of hybrid and lightweight detection methods for third-party tracking. Their study focused on designing and evaluating systems that could detect and block third-party trackers without significantly impacting page load times or user experience. The results demonstrated that these advanced detection methods could successfully mitigate the privacy risks associated with third-party tracking while maintaining a lightweight footprint on device resources, contributing to both privacy protection and power efficiency [10].
The growing prevalence of ad-blocking technologies has spurred research into alternative marketing strategies and the broader implications of ad blockers on digital advertising and content consumption. Goh explored various marketing techniques and tools designed to combat ad-blocking and ad-avoidance in social media advertising. His research highlighted the challenges advertisers face in reaching audiences who actively use ad blockers and the strategies being developed to engage users through more subtle and integrated advertising methods that are less likely to be blocked or avoided [11].
Afzal et al. conducted a comprehensive survey on the power consumption and environmental impact of video streaming, a major component of online content delivery that is particularly affected by ad-blocking technologies. Their findings indicate that while video streaming is a power-intensive activity, the presence of ads within streams exacerbates this consumption. The study emphasizes the need for more power-efficient video streaming practices and the potential role of ad blockers in reducing the environmental footprint of this activity by eliminating resource-heavy ads [12].
Yan et al. examined the impact of ad blockers on news consumption, providing insights into how the adoption of ad-blocking tools affects user behavior in accessing news content. Their study found that while ad blockers generally improve the user experience by removing intrusive ads, they also lead to a decrease in the visibility and revenue of news outlets that rely on ad-based monetization. This shift has prompted news providers to explore alternative revenue models, such as subscription services and native advertising, which are less dependent on traditional banner ads [13].
Klym and Clark discussed the future of the ad-supported internet ecosystem, focusing on the economic implications of widespread ad-blocker adoption. Their research suggests that as ad blockers become more prevalent, there may be significant shifts in how content is monetized online, potentially leading to a more sustainable internet economy. This could involve a move towards less intrusive, more power-efficient advertising methods that align with the growing consumer demand for privacy and sustainability [14].
Kim, Lee, and Kim explored the potential of blockchain technology to enhance the effectiveness and trustworthiness of digital advertising. Their study highlights how blockchain could address many of the challenges posed by ad blockers by enabling more transparent and efficient advertising transactions. This approach could help restore user trust in digital ads and reduce the incentive to use ad blockers, thereby maintaining the revenue streams for content providers while potentially improving power efficiency in ad delivery [15].
The exploration of ad-blocking technologies has highlighted various aspects of their performance, privacy implications, and the ongoing counter-measures developed by advertisers. Garimella, Kostakis, and Mathioudakis conducted a comprehensive study on ad-blocking, focusing on how these tools affect performance, user privacy, and the effectiveness of counter-measures employed by advertisers. Their findings suggest that while ad blockers significantly improve browsing speed and protect user privacy, advertisers are continuously developing more sophisticated techniques to bypass these blockers, which could potentially undermine their effectiveness over time [16].
Privacy concerns associated with targeted advertising have been a growing area of research, especially in the context of ad-blocking. Ullah, Boreli, and Kanhere provided an extensive survey on privacy issues in targeted advertising, discussing how ad-blockers play a crucial role in mitigating privacy risks. Their study emphasized that while ad blockers can protect users from invasive tracking, they often face challenges from increasingly sophisticated tracking technologies that seek to circumvent these protections [17].
Adversarial machine learning techniques have emerged as a new frontier in the battle between ad blockers and advertisers. Tramèr et al. explored the concept of perceptual ad blocking, which uses adversarial machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of ad-blockers. Their research demonstrated that while these advanced techniques can improve ad-blocking performance, they also introduce new challenges as advertisers develop counter-strategies to evade detection [18].
Mehanna delved into the environmental impacts of modern advertising practices, particularly focusing on the carbon footprint associated with online ads. His research examined novel tracking practices and how they contribute to the overall environmental impact of digital advertising. Mehanna’s findings suggest that while ad blockers can reduce the power consumption associated with displaying ads, the ongoing development of more complex tracking and advertising methods may offset these gains [19].
The rise of native advertising, which blends advertising content with regular editorial content, has been another response to the increasing use of ad-blockers. Lynch explored the disruption caused by native advertising in digital news feeds, noting that while this approach can bypass traditional ad-blocking methods, it also raises ethical questions about the transparency and trustworthiness of online content. Native advertising’s subtlety makes it less likely to be blocked, but it also challenges the effectiveness of ad-blockers in protecting user experience and privacy [20].
The impact of ad-blockers on consumer behavior and the broader digital landscape has been a subject of considerable academic inquiry. Todri explored the influence of ad-blockers on online consumer behavior, finding that the use of ad-blockers can significantly alter how consumers interact with online content. The study revealed that ad-blockers not only improve user experience by removing intrusive ads but also change the dynamics of consumer engagement, potentially leading to lower click-through rates for advertisers [21].
Redondo and Aznar examined the factors that influence users’ decisions to adopt ad-blockers. Their research highlighted that users’ knowledge of ad blockers and their attitudes toward online advertising are critical determinants of ad-blocker usage. They found that users who are more informed about the negative impacts of online ads, such as privacy invasion and power consumption, are more likely to use ad-blockers. This shift in user behavior has significant implications for the sustainability of ad-supported digital content [22].
Zhang provided a broader overview of the state of digital marketing, discussing the technological and business landscapes that shape modern advertising strategies. His dissertation emphasizes the growing complexity of digital marketing, which increasingly relies on advanced algorithms and big data to target consumers effectively. However, this complexity also drives up power consumption, particularly in the processing and delivery of targeted ads [23].
Pearce focused on the power conservation potential of open-source ad blockers, discussing how tools like uBlock Origin can reduce power consumption by preventing ads from loading. His research suggests that the widespread adoption of such ad blockers could lead to significant global power savings, particularly by reducing the demand on servers and data centers required to deliver digital ads [24].
Souza et al. took a more technical approach, investigating how power consumption in Android mobile devices can be optimized based on user recommendations. Their study highlighted the role of user behavior in power consumption, showing that personalized settings and the use of power-efficient apps, including ad-blockers, can significantly reduce the power usage of mobile devices [25].
Wang et al. explored a green intelligent routing algorithm that supports flexible Quality of Service (QoS) for many-to-many multicast, contributing to power efficiency in digital communication networks. While their research is more focused on network infrastructure, the implications for digital advertising are clear: optimizing network efficiency can also reduce the power footprint of delivering online ads [26].
Experiment
This section details the experimental procedures undertaken to evaluate the impact of different ad blockers on power consumption during web browsing. The design, testing environment, tools, and methodologies used are carefully outlined to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results, allowing for a thorough comparison across various scenarios.
Experimental Design
The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of various ad blockers on power consumption during web browsing across a range of website types. The experiment was meticulously designed to ensure consistency, accuracy, and relevance, enabling the comparison of power consumption under different browsing scenarios.
Testing Environment
The experiments were conducted on a standard mid-range consumer laptop configured with an Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7300U CPU and 16 GB of RAM, operating on Windows 11 Home. Google Chrome was selected as the browser for all tests due to its widespread usage and reliability. Power consumption data was measured using HWinfo, a robust system monitoring tool recognized for its precision in capturing power usage metrics.
Ad Blockers Evaluated
The study analyzed the performance of five widely used ad blockers:
- AdBlock
- AdBlock Plus
- uBlock
- uBlock Origin
- uBlock Origin Lite
These ad blockers were chosen based on their popularity and distinct filtering algorithms, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of their effectiveness in reducing power consumption. Browser with built in shield like brave, Libre wolf and harden Firefox were not studied.
Website Selection
The websites tested were categorized into four primary types, each representing a different content format:
- Multimedia Websites: YouTube, 9gagTV, KissCartoon, Dailymotion, ARYZAP
- News Websites: The News, Dawn News, Ausaf Newspaper
- Sports Websites: Cricinfo, Cricbuzz
These sites were selected for their diverse content, ranging from data-heavy multimedia to text-focused news and sports content, thereby offering a thorough examination of ad blocker performance across different web environments.
Testing Procedure
The experiment followed a systematic procedure to ensure reliability and repeatability:
Each website was loaded five times under each of the following conditions:
- Without any ad blocker (baseline)
- With AdBlock enabled
- With AdBlock Plus enabled
- With uBlock enabled
- With uBlock Origin enabled
- With uBlock Origin Lite enabled
Each browsing session was timed for exactly five minutes, during which power consumption in watts was recorded.
The network conditions were maintained consistently across all tests to eliminate variability and isolate the effect of the ad blockers on power consumption.
Results
The results are summarized in the tables and bar graphs below, presenting the average power consumption across the different website types and ad blocker configurations.
Multimedia Websites
On average, ad blockers like AdBlock Plus and uBlock Origin Lite reduce power consumption on multimedia websites by approximately 40%, with the most significant savings observed on platforms such as Dailymotion and YouTube. For instance, Dailymotion’s power usage drops from 5.9 W without a blocker to around 2.3 W with AdBlock Plus, nearly halving the energy consumption. These figures highlight the effectiveness of these ad blockers in managing the high energy demands of video-rich content, making them valuable tools for more energy-efficient web browsing, as shown in Table I.
Website | No AdBlock | AdBlock | AdBlock plus | uBlock | uBlock origin | uBlock origin lite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9gagTV | 3.9 | 3.7 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.5 |
ARYZAP | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 2.2 |
Dailymotion | 5.9 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
KissCartoon | 2.1 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 2.1 |
YouTube | 3.6 | 2.2 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 2.8 |
The results are further illustrated in the following bar graphs to provide a clear visual comparison of the power consumption across different websites and ad blockers.
News and Sports Websites
The results from Table II show that ad blockers like AdBlock Plus and uBlock Origin Lite are particularly effective in reducing power consumption on news and sports websites, achieving an average reduction of around 35%. For example, Cricbuzz’s power consumption significantly decreases from 6.8 W to approximately 2.3 W when using AdBlock Plus. This indicates that these ad blockers are capable of minimizing the energy demands associated with web browsing on text-heavy sites, where ads can still impact overall power usage. These findings are clearly detailed in Table II.
Website | No AdBlock | AdBlock | AdBlock Plus | uBlock | uBlock origin | uBlock origin lite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ausaf | 3.8 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.4 |
Cricbuzz | 6.8 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.7 |
Dawn News | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 3.2 | 4.1 | 3.1 |
Cricinfo | 4.6 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 2.6 |
The News | 4.2 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.3 |
Visual Representation of Results
The results are further illustrated in the following bar graphs to provide a clear visual comparison of the power consumption across different websites and ad blockers.
The bar graph in Fig. 1 displays the power consumption for multimedia websites (YouTube, Dailymotion, 9gagTV, KissCartoon) across the different ad blockers tested.
Fig. 1. Power consumption on multimedia websites.
The bar graph in Fig. 2 presents the power consumption for news and sports websites (The News, Dawn News, Ausaf Newspaper, Cricinfo, Cricbuzz) across the different ad blockers tested.
Fig. 2. Power consumption on news and sports websites.
Analysis of Results
The data presented in Tables I and II, along with the corresponding bar graphs, reveal several critical insights regarding the efficiency of ad blockers in reducing power consumption during web browsing.
Overall Efficiency: Across the various websites tested, AdBlock Plus and uBlock Origin Lite emerged as the most effective ad blockers, consistently reducing power consumption. Notably, AdBlock Plus demonstrated substantial power savings on data-intensive multimedia websites such as Dailymotion and YouTube, where it reduced power consumption by nearly 50%.
Content-Specific Performance: The effectiveness of ad blockers varied depending on the type of website. Multimedia websites, which typically include rich media content like videos, saw the most significant reductions in power consumption. In contrast, the impact of ad blockers on text-heavy news and sports websites was less pronounced, suggesting that the ads on these sites are less power-intensive or that the ad blockers were less effective in these contexts.
Anomalies: An unexpected result was observed with uBlock Origin on Dawn News, where power consumption increased when the ad blocker was enabled. This anomaly suggests that certain ad blockers may introduce inefficiencies in specific scenarios, potentially due to increased processing demands when filtering complex content. In some cases, different ads of the same duration were inserted by the website.
Discussion
The findings of this study underscore the importance of selecting appropriate ad blockers based on the type of content being accessed. AdBlock Plus and uBlock Origin Lite were particularly effective on multimedia-heavy websites, where the potential for power savings is greatest. However, the unexpected increase in power consumption with uBlock Origin on Dawn News highlights the need for further optimization of ad-blocking technologies to ensure they do not inadvertently increase power usage in certain scenarios.
The significant reduction in power consumption on multimedia sites points to the substantial power costs associated with video ads. This finding supports the broader argument for using ad blockers not only to improve user experience but also to promote more sustainable web browsing practices.
Conclusions and Future Work
This study has demonstrated that ad blockers can significantly reduce power consumption during web browsing, particularly on multimedia-heavy websites. Tools like AdBlock Plus and uBlock Origin Lite were found to be especially effective, offering substantial power savings. However, the study also identified potential inefficiencies, such as the unexpected increase in power consumption with uBlock Origin on certain websites, underscoring the need for further optimization of ad-blocking algorithms to ensure consistent performance across diverse content types.
Looking forward, future research should focus on refining these algorithms to enhance power efficiency while minimizing computational demands. Expanding the scope of the study to include a broader range of websites and conducting longitudinal analyses could provide deeper insights into the long-term benefits of ad blockers. Additionally, exploring the integration of emerging technologies such as AI and blockchain could pave the way for more adaptive and decentralized ad-blocking solutions, ultimately contributing to more sustainable and power-efficient web browsing practices. it is recommended to repeat this study on different brewers with built-in shields or ad blockers like Brane, Libre Wolf, harden firefox, and Tor browser. use of different OS like Ubuntu, Chrome OS Flex, Debian without snaps, Tails, etc., for the same condition is also suggested. The impact of the use of different hardware other than x86 architecture like ARM SBC, RISC-V based SBC, and the addition of tensor processing unit (TPU), neural processing unit (NPU), and AI accelerator in addition to x86 or ARM processor should also be explored.
References
-
Ren S, Hao Y, Xu L, Wu H, Ba N. Digitalization and energy: how does internet development affect China’s energy consumption? Energy Econ. 2021 Jun 1;98:105220.
Google Scholar
1
-
Thangam D, Chavadi C. Impact of digital marketing practices on energy consumption, climate change, and sustainability. Clim and Energy. 2023 Feb;39(7):11–9.
Google Scholar
2
-
George DA, George AH. The evolution of content delivery network: how it enhances video services, streaming, games, e-commerce, and advertising. Int J Adv Res Elect, Electr Instrum Eng (IJA-REEIE). 2021;10(7):10435–42.
Google Scholar
3
-
Ulin JC. The Business of Media Distribution: Monetizing Film, TV, and Video Content in an Online World. 4th ed. London, UK: Routledge; 2019.
Google Scholar
4
-
Ji Y, Wang R, Gou Q. Monetization on mobile platforms: balancing in-app advertising and user base growth. Prod Oper Manag. 2019 Sep;28(9):2202–20.
Google Scholar
5
-
Albasir A. An evaluation of smartphone resources used by web advertisements. M.S. Thesis, University of Waterloo; 2013.
Google Scholar
6
-
Pärssinen M, Kotila M, Cuevas R, Phansalkar A, Manner J. Environmental impact assessment of online advertising. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2018 Nov 1;73:177–200.
Google Scholar
7
-
Castell-Uroz I, Sanz-García R, Solé-Pareta J, Barlet-Ros P. Demystifying content-blockers: measuring their impact on performance and quality of experience. IEEE Trans Netw Serv Manag. 2022 May 31;19(3):3562–73.
Google Scholar
8
-
Frik A, Haviland A, Acquisti A. The impact of {Ad-Blockers} on product search and purchase behavior: a lab experiment. 29th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 20), pp. 163–79, 2020.
Google Scholar
9
-
Cozza F, Guarino A, Isernia F, Malandrino D, Rapuano A, Schiavone R, Zaccagnino R. Hybrid and lightweight detection of third party tracking: design, implementation, and evaluation. Comput Netw. 2020 Feb 11;167:106993.
Google Scholar
10
-
Goh WK (2020). Social media advertising: An exploration of marketing technique and tools to combat ad-blocking and ad-avoidance, Ph.D. dissertation. National College of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Google Scholar
11
-
Afzal S, Mehran N, Ourimi ZA, Tashtarian F, Amirpour H, Prodan R, et al. A survey on energy consumption and environmental impact of video streaming. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.09854. 2024 Jan 18.
Google Scholar
12
-
Yan S, Miller KM, Skiera B. How does the adoption of ad blockers affect news consumption? J Mark Res. 2022 Oct;59(5):1002–18.
Google Scholar
13
-
Klym N, Clark D. The Future of the Ad-Supported Internet Ecosystem. Internet Policy Research Initiative at MIT. 2017.
Google Scholar
14
-
Kim J, Lee KH, Kim J. Linking blockchain technology and digital advertising: how blockchain technology can enhance digital advertising to be more effective, efficient, and trustworthy. J Bus Res. 2023 May 1;160:113819.
Google Scholar
15
-
Garimella K, Kostakis O, Mathioudakis M. Ad-blocking: A study on performance, privacy and counter-measures. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference, pp. 259–62, 2017 Jun 25.
Google Scholar
16
-
Ullah I, Boreli R, Kanhere SS. Privacy in targeted advertising: a survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.06861. 2020 Sep 15.
Google Scholar
17
-
Tramèr F, Dupré P, Rusak G, Pellegrino G, Boneh D. Adversarial: perceptual ad blocking meets adversarial machine learning. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 2005–21, 2019 Nov 6.
Google Scholar
18
-
Mehanna N. Intrinsically inseparable: Investigating novel tracking practices and assessing the carbon footprint of ads. Ph.D. Dissertation, University de Lille, Lille, France; 2023.
Google Scholar
19
-
Lynch L. Native Advertising: Advertorial Disruption in the 21st-Century News Feed. Routledge; 2018 Jun 12.
Google Scholar
20
-
Todri V. Frontiers: the impact of ad-blockers on online consumer behavior. Mark Sci. 2022 Jan;41(1):7–18.
Google Scholar
21
-
Redondo I, Aznar G. To use or not to use ad blockers? The roles of knowledge of ad blockers and attitude toward online advertising. Telematics Inform. 2018 Sep 1;35(6):1607–16.
Google Scholar
22
-
Zhang X. The state of digital marketing: Technology and business landscape. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; 2016.
Google Scholar
23
-
Pearce JM. Energy conservation with open source ad blockers. Technologies. 2020 Mar 30;8(2):18.
Google Scholar
24
-
Souza E, Monteiro E, Barreto R, de Freitas R. Optimizing energy consumption in android mobile devices based on user recommendations. International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, pp. 1–11, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2023 Dec 11.
Google Scholar
25
-
Wang X, Zhang J, Huang M, Yang S. A green intelligent routing algorithm supporting flexible QoS for many-to-many multicast. Comput Netw. 2017 Oct 24;126:229–45.
Google Scholar
26
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Uday Khadodra,
Md Habibur Rahaman,
Mohsin Jamil,
Design of Renewable Energy System for a House in St. John’s, Canada , European Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science: Vol. 4 No. 3 (2020) -
Yuet Sing Li,
Mohammad Bahrami,
Mohammad Faraji Nejad,
Mohammad Tariq Iqbal,
Design and Simulation of a Hybrid Power System for St. Lewis in Labrador , European Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science: Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023) -
Afzal Ahmed,
Mohammad Tariq Iqbal,
Mohsin Jamil,
A Comparative Analysis of Power Consumption While Using Open-Source and Proprietary Media Players , European Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science: Vol. 8 No. 5 (2024)